USA News

Successful Aging turns 21: What I’ve learned from readers

Each October I write an anniversary column that reflects what I have learned from our readers. This is year 21 and 1,038 columns later.

In deciding what to write, I reread each email from this past year and then sort them according to topics. Those topics with the most responses typically are included in the column.

This year, I received the most emails on the subject of ageism. Because of the volume and their richness, I am devoting part one of the anniversary column just to this one area. We also received many other emails on retirement, downsizing, meditation, elder abuse, creativity, exercise, employment, purpose, loss and more. Several of these will be shared next week.

Now to the ageism stories and perspectives:

A 65-year-old woman was asked by her doctor’s nurse practitioner the current date and name of the president of the United States. She was curious about the reason for the question since she is physically and mentally healthy. Her thought was that the question was based solely on her age. The same reader objected to suggested age cutoffs for elected officials, noting that “experience and wisdom are priceless.”

A reader indicated one of the reasons he does not watch network news is because so few of the TV characters are older, referring to the 1.5 percent mentioned in my column of September 2, 2022.

Another area of expressed ageism was from a former employee who was laid off at age 59 with 35 years of technical experience. He was replaced by a 21-year-old who quit after one year. Although he’d received numerous government awards, the 300 resumes he sent to prospective employers yielded no results. He ended his note by writing, “Not sure what can be done about it. It’s probably too late for me now that I just turned 70.”

A reader found a cell phone advertisement somewhat ageist. The ad was for “the senior who has to just push the red button if she needs help. It’s just that easy.” This advertisement catering to seniors who need utter simplicity is ageist and offensive, she noted. The reader compared the advertisement to a competitor’s, which referred to older adults as “active and intelligent who are enjoying retirement and need a reasonable plan” for their phones.

And from the Bay Area, a reader found the emphasis on diversity, equity and inclusion somewhat lacking. While pleased to see many elements of inclusion represented, the reader noted “you didn’t find a single person over 40 displayed and the word ‘age’ isn’t included in any of their diversity metrics. They don’t even try.”

File source

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button